Rei Sakamoto vs Steven Diez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 May at 10:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Sakamoto vs S. Diez

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sakamoto 1 - 0 Diez
They have played 3 sets in total, with Rei Sakamoto winning 2 and Steven Diez winning 1. The last match between Rei Sakamoto and Steven Diez was at the Heilbronn Challenger, 01-06-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Rei Sakamoto getting the victory 4-6 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sakamoto | 1 |
| Diez | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Heilbronn Challenger(06-01-25)
R. Sakamoto vs S. Diez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $113,620 | Career Prize Money | $335,910 |
| 50.83% (61-59) | Career Total W/L | 54.64% (571-474) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 24 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Sakamoto vs S. Diez Match Preview:
- How does Sakamoto's second serve fare in recent matches? Sakamoto has captured 44.17% of points on their second serve, surpassing Diez's 39.35% for a slightly stronger performance.
- Who excels in returning their opponent's second serves? Despite only a small edge, Sakamoto wins 44.56% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Diez's 44.22%.
- Diez demonstrates superior first serve return ability, managing a 32.97% success rate, whereas Sakamoto achieves only 23.3%.
- Sakamoto exhibits a touch better under pressure by saving 55.19% of breakpoints, just ahead of Diez at 53.08%.
- In terms of overall performance, Diez holds a narrow lead with 55.56% of matches won in the past year, against Sakamoto's 53.33%.
- Both players excel on hard surface courts, with Diez slightly ahead, winning 57% of matches, compared to Sakamoto's 53%.
- Diez generally competes at a lower tournament level, winning 64% of matches, while Sakamoto wins 60% at slightly higher-level tournaments.
- The average rank of opponents Sakamoto plays against is stronger (314.53) than for Diez, whose opponents average 399.38 in rank.
- Regarding performance in deciding sets, Sakamoto dominates, winning 58% of such sets, leaving Diez with a substantially lower 27%.
- Though Diez excels in breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 51.09% of chances, Sakamoto lags at 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):
A close examination of the available statistics unveils a competitive edge for Sakamoto in several departments. His second serve reliability outshines Diez, as does his ability to handle pressure situations by saving breakpoints more effectively.
Despite Diez's prowess on hard surfaces and slightly superior overall performance, Sakamoto's experience competing against tougher opponents and his remarkable performance in deciding sets could be crucial in high-pressure situations.
However, it is crucial to observe Diez’s impressive breakpoint conversion rate, which could turn the tide in crucial moments. Nonetheless, given Sakamoto’s overall consistency and ability to perform under pressure, he appears to be the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Rei Sakamoto vs Steven Diez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Sakamoto vs S. Diez H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:12:53 | Average Match Time | 2:12:53 |
| 69% (60/87) | 1st Serve % | 63% (50/79) |
| 72% (43/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (34/50) |
| 56% (15/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (11/29) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 43% (34/79) | Return Points Win % | 33% (29/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Sakamoto Recent Matches Played
S. Diez Recent Matches Played

R. Sakamoto vs S. Diez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.26% (61/58) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.64% (571/474) |
| 49.64% (137/139) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.52% (1285/1072) |
| 48.71% (1282/1350) | Games Win/Loss | 52.19% (11187/10250) |
| 54.05% (40/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.53% (212/163) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.87% (338/267) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.96% (18/35) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 0.5 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 642 | Aces Total | 1110 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 285 | Total Double Faults | 1791 |
| 1:45:3 | Average Match Time | 1:9:1 |
| 377.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 576.16 |
| 61% (5113/8330) | 1st Serve % | 63% (29963/47216) |
| 69% (3536/5113) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (19468/29963) |
| 51% (1642/3217) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8390/17253) |
| 38% (261/687) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2388/5143) |
| 37% (3014/8184) | Return Points Win % | 42% (20073/47619) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Slam W/L | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Masters W/L | 25.00% (4/12) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 34.48% (20/38) |
| 56.67% (34/26) | Challenger W/L | 45.31% (198/239) |
| 48.84% (21/22) | Futures W/L | 67.47% (334/161) |
| 51% (60/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (557/1009) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 59% (24/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (109/233) |
| 61% (23/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (136/285) |
| 82% (56/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (588/490) |
| 18% (56/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (588/97) |
| 24% (63/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (456/80) |